Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0287143, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association between public perception of the appropriateness of management strategies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and the level of disturbances in daily activities reported by the general population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Korea Community Health Survey conducted from August to November 2020. Public perception of COVID-19 management strategies included those implemented by the government (central, city or provincial, and administrative districts), the mass media, regional medical institutions, and neighbors. The subjective level of disturbances in daily activities was measured using a 0-100 numeric rating scale developed by Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on education level. RESULTS: The present study analyzed 211,353 participants. Compared to individuals who perceived that the management strategies implemented during the pandemic was 'highly appropriate,' those who reported 'mediocre appropriateness' (ß: -1.96, p-value: <0.001) or 'low appropriateness' (ß: -3.60, p-value: 0.010) reported higher levels of subjective disturbances. The appropriateness of measures implemented by the mass media was associated with levels of subjective disturbances felt by individuals of lower education with statistical significance, whereas that applied by the mass media and the government were important in those with higher education. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the importance of public perception of management strategies when implementing containment policies and minimizing its disturbances on daily lives is essential.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Public Opinion , Educational Status
2.
Int J Environ Health Res ; : 1-16, 2023 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2324115

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the association between area deprivation level and performance of handwashing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korean adults. This study used data from the 2015 Population and Housing Census data to measure area deprivation level. The 2020 Korea Community Health Survey was used for all other variables, including hand hygiene behavior (August through November 2020). The association between area deprivation level and practice of handwashing behavior was examined using multilevel logistic regression analysis. The study population comprised 215,676 adults aged 19 years or above. Compared to the least area deprived group, the most deprived group was more likely to not wash hands after using the restroom (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.82), after coming home (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.43-2.39), and using soap (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.29-1.84). The findings suggest the importance of considering area deprivation in implementing policies that promote handwashing, particularly during a pandemic.

3.
Int J Soc Psychiatry ; : 207640211066737, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated containment policies have led to negative mental health consequences in the general population. AIMS: This study investigated the association between perceived social support and depressive symptoms in Korea. METHODS: Data from the Korea Community Health Survey conducted from August to November 2020 was used for this cross-sectional study. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and perceived social support was assessed based on the number of contacts that participants had identified as being available in case participants needed isolation due to COVID-19 exposure. This study included the general adult populations aged 19 years and older. The relationship between the perceived social support and depressive symptoms was analyzed using multivariable liner regression analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on income. RESULTS: Analysis of the data obtained from 225,453 participants indicated that PHQ-9 scores were highest in the group with 'no' perceived social support, followed by 'low', 'middle', and 'high' perceived levels of social support. Compared to individuals with 'high' perceived social support, those with 'middle' (ß: .10, p-value <.001), 'low (ß: .07, p-value .010), and 'no' (ß: .34, p-value <.001) perceived levels of social support showed poorer depression scores. The magnitude of the relationship found was particularly strong in the low-income group. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals' depression scores varied according to their perceived level of social support. Strategies that address the need of vulnerable individuals are required to reduce the potentially negative mental health consequences of the pandemic.

4.
Epidemiol Health ; : e2022085, 2022 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246598

ABSTRACT

Objectives: After the third wave of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), by mid-February 2021, approximately 0.16% of the population was confirmed positive, which appeared to be one of the lowest rates worldwide at that time. However, asymptomatic transmission poses a challenge for COVID-19 surveillance. Therefore, a community-based serosurvey of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was conducted to understand the effectiveness of Korea's strong containment strategy. Methods: We collected 5,002 residual sera samples from January 30 to March 3, 2021 from 265 medical facilities in Seoul, 346 in Kyunggi-do' and 57 in Incheon. Among them, 60 samples from tertiary institutions were excluded. We defined the sub-regions according to the addresses of the medical facilities where the specimens were collected. Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 was used for the screening test, and positivity was confirmed using the SARS-CoV-2 sVNT Kit. Prevalence was estimated using sampling weight and the Wilson score interval for a binomial proportion with a 95% confidence interval. Results: Among the 4,942 specimens, 32 and 25 tested positive for COVID-19 in the screening and confirmatory tests, respectively. The overall crude prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody was 0.51%. The population-adjusted overall prevalence was 0.55% in women and 0.38% in men. The region-specific estimation was 0.67% and 0.30% in Gyeonggi-do and Seoul, respectively. No positive cases were detected in Incheon. Conclusion: The proportion of undetected cases in South Korea remains low. Therefore, an infection control strategy with exhaustive tracing and widespread pre-emptive testing appears to be effective in containing the spread of the virus in the community.

5.
J Psychosom Res ; 166: 111160, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2180934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak led to reduced levels of physical activity, but this has been rarely studied in patients with hypertension. This study investigated the association between depressive symptoms and changes in physical activity of patients with hypertension during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: Data were from the Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS), conducted between August to November 2020. The KCHS is a nationwide cross-sectional survey that evaluates information on various sociodemographic, economic, and health related variables. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Physical activity was measured using a questionnaire inquiring whether participants experienced any changes in physical activity after the pandemic. The association between depressive symptoms and changes in physical activity level were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 55,203 patients, 39.6% responded that they had experienced lower levels of physical activity due to the pandemic and showed increased likelihoods of depressive symptoms (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54) than individuals who responded that they had performed similar levels of physical activity. This tendency was stronger in patients that did not receive treatment for hypertension (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.02-4.23) than those who did receive treatment with marginal significance (p-value of interaction term: 0.1241). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased levels of physical activity due to the outbreak was experienced by a noticeable proportion of patients with hypertension and was associated with increased likelihoods of depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Humans , Depression/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mental Health , Exercise , Hypertension/epidemiology
6.
Epidemiol Health ; 45: e2023008, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2202168

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compared the viral cycle threshold (Ct) values of infected patients to better understand viral kinetics by vaccination status during different periods of variant predominance in Gyeonggi Province, Korea. METHODS: We obtained case-specific data from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance system, Gyeonggi in-depth epidemiological report system, and Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service from January 2020 to January 2022. We defined periods of variant predominance and explored Ct values by analyzing viral sequencing test results. Using a generalized additive model, we performed a nonlinear regression analysis to determine viral kinetics over time. RESULTS: Cases in the Delta variant's period of predominance had higher viral shedding patterns than cases in other periods. The temporal change of viral shedding did not vary by vaccination status in the Omicron-predominant period, but viral shedding decreased in patients who had completed their third vaccination in the Delta-predominant period. During the Delta-predominant and Omicron-predominant periods, the time from symptom onset to peak viral shedding based on the E gene was approximately 2.4 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 2.5) and 2.1 days (95% CI, 2.0 to 2.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In one-time tests conducted to diagnose COVID-19 in a large population, although no adjustment for individual characteristics was conducted, it was confirmed that viral shedding differed by the predominant strain and vaccination history. These results show the value of utilizing hundreds of thousands of test data produced at COVID-19 screening test centers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Virus Shedding , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
7.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 2022 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1758844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association between various types of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related fear and the level of area deprivation in Korea. METHODS: Different types of COVID-19-related fear were examined, namely fear of infection, fear of dying from infection, fear of public criticism, fear of a family member getting infected and fear of economic loss. The level of area deprivation was measured based on the Area Deprivation Index, which was calculated based on population census data. The association between various types of COVID-19-related fear and the level of area deprivation was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: This study included 199 859 individuals from the 253 administrative divisions in South Korea. Findings indicated that fear was most common in individuals residing in the most deprived areas, followed by those in the mediocre and least deprived areas (fear of infection: odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.09; fear of dying from infection: OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.19-1.28; fear of public criticism: OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15-1.24; fear of a family member getting infected: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the need to monitor and account for area deprivation in managing the psychological health effects of the COVID-19 crisis.

8.
Epidemiol Health ; 44: e2022004, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1726428

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Unexpected changes in daily routines caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may affect psychological health. This study investigated the association between various types of COVID-19-related fear and the subjective level of disturbance in daily activities experienced by individuals. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Korea Community Health Survey conducted from August through November 2020. COVID-19-related fear included fear of infection, death, public criticism, family members getting infected, and economic loss. The subjective level of disruption in daily activities was measured using a 0-100 numeric rating scale developed by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the associations between the independent and dependent variables. A subgroup analysis was performed based on income level. RESULTS: Participants who reported fear of infection (ß=-3.37, p<0.001), death (ß=-0.33, p=0.030), public criticism (ß=-1.63, p<0.001), a family member getting infected (ß=-1.03, p<0.001), and economic loss (ß=-3.52, p<0.001) experienced more disturbances in daily activities. The magnitude of this association was most significant in the lowest-income group. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals reporting COVID-19-related fear experienced higher levels of subjective disruption in daily activities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fear , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Psychiatry Investig ; 19(2): 92-99, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1634072

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the association between ability to rest at home in times of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptom manifestation and depressive symptoms. METHODS: The 2020 Korea Community Health Survey data were used. The presence of depressive symptoms was determined using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The relationship between depressive symptoms and ability to rest at home was examined using logistic regression analysis. Additional analysis was performed on the reasons for the inability to stay at home. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were more common in participants who could not rest at home if symptoms manifested (4.1%) than those who could rest at home (2.7%). Participants who could not rest at home (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.34-1.74) were more likely to have depressive symptoms, particularly when they had to report to work (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.30-1.74) or purchase daily necessities (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.15-5.03). CONCLUSION: Inability to rest at home in the case of COVID-19 symptom manifestation was associated with depressive symptoms. The findings suggest the need to address the identified vulnerable groups to mitigate the mental health consequences of the pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL